Tuesday, 8 December 2015

IT’S A WAR, NOT A CRIME WAVE « The Burning Platform

IT’S A WAR, NOT A CRIME WAVE « The Burning Platform



Guest Post by Ol’ Remus
art-remus-ident-04.jpg As I wrote here after the Paris Massacre:
The time for importing more Moslems and forcing us to adopt and adore them is over. The time for reducing their numbers only in distant lands is over. The time for “bringing the perpetrators to justice” is over—it’s war, not a crime wave. The time for candle light vigils is over. Those in DC who won’t do what needs doing need to be compelled to step aside for those who will.
Attorney General Lynch disagrees. The day after the San Bernadino massacre she spoke at the Muslim Advocate’s 10th anniversary fund raiser—an interesting choice of venue—and assured them “we stand with you.” She said she would use her Justice Department to protect Muslims, you know, from all the angry mobs that are beating up their kids on their way to school and burning down mosques and assaulting their wives in supermarkets and clinics and shooting them wholesale at holiday celebrations—oh wait. She went on to say the Constitution does not protect “actions predicated on violent talk” and pledged to prosecute those responsible. Um, what does she mean? Did she just tell us this is none of our business? Or that we have to clear our comments with the Bureau of Hurt Feelings lest we be swept up in a future roundup of co-conspirators?
We have to excuse Lynch, she thinks it’s her job to tell us what we can say to each other, and she gets all but incoherent when she tries to talk uppity, but it’s okay, her people will decide what she meant when the time’s right. Sounds like she means shut up and walk away, nothing to see here, citizen. Hmm. The same threat we get from the Moslems. A mere coincidence. We know she doesn’t mean DoJ will defend the First Amendment and move against violent, scheming Islamists in an effective way, it would just be so wrong. Oh, and because guns, the ever-reliable red herring. Can global warming be far behind? Here’s Lynch again, this time all girly-giddy:

No comments:

Post a Comment